Huntington Theory †Military Professional Essay

Scholars like Kaplan, Friedman, Huntington and Barnett lead postulated various theories on array service. Samuel P Huntington is one of the scholars who have postulated theories of phalanx service. His possibility is also referred to as the rule opening. This stem seeks to show how Huntingtons theory impacts on ones future in soldiers service. Discussion Owen M (2010) gives citation to Samuel Huntington for his role in developing the normal theory.Owen points out that through this theory Huntington endeavored to influence up the dilemma of how to guarantee civil make of the armament plot of land still ensuring the susceptibility of the uniformed military to provide security. Huntington cited in Owen (2010) says the solution to this dilemma lies in a mechanism for creating and maintaining a professional, apolitical military establishment, which he called objective control. In this regard, Huntington cited in Williams (1995), says the comm oneness should have control over the military and soldiery professionals should be denied somewhat of the privileges enjoyed by civilians like political affiliations. politics is a game of numbers, in my soak up, this may disadvantage military officers who harbour ambitious of venturing in politics because they are denied social function in political berthies affairs. This impacts negatively on their popularity with the voters.However, there are those candidates such as 2008 republican candidate John McCain who utilize their experience in the military as a campaign tool to endear themselves to the voters. In my view, professional and experienced military officers make better commander in chief of the armed forces. Additionally, Idsa (2010) concurs with Huntington that one mood of achieving civilian control of the military is by ensuring that the funding of the military is left in the hands of the civilian institutions.Idsa points out that civilian institutions should allow the military to advise the m on military matters but ultimately the military should only executive those decisions approved by the civilian institutions. In my view this may endanger the lives of military officers. Due to towering budgetary needs of a country, military equipment needed in times of contend may be sacrificed to meet other needs in a nonher heavens of the economy. Huntington theory goes along way in developing responsible and knowledgeable persons.As Idsa (2010) points out military professionals should present their considerations within the appropriate channel of authority and communication. To in effect carry out his/her duties, Huntington as cited in Williams (1995) states that an army officer must be highly expertise, cooperative and responsible in his profession. He meant that an officer must be sound knowledgeable in combating violence. Williams (1995) while says that after training the officers should only work with three words duty, honor, country. As a result, Huntington envisag ed a military force resign of corruption.The officer is expected to be diverse from other skilled workers in that notes should not play any part enticing one to join the forces. However, the army professional should be well rewarded so as to promote hiring, maintain the officers in the force and boost their morale. Williams (1995) says that Huntington argued that a well skilled army professional should be willing to observe the legal requirements make by citizen organizations recognized by law. In addition, the officers should accept to act as subordinates to individuals as required by legalized community organizations.The military officers are expected to hold a high opinion of their career and should not cause civil unrest or run the government. Since the army professionals are recruited with trustworthy levels of qualification, and by the virtue that they belong in the uniform profession and hold same competencies, the officers tend to exhibit cooperativeness. This supports the statement of Huntington as quoted by Williams (1995) that the members of a profession grapple a sense of organic unity and consciousness of themselves as a host apart from laymen. . This attribute is fostered by their earthy training which take quite a long duration, collective discipline and communion of their societal tasks (Williams, 1995). Conclusion In view of the above statements, Huntington theory helps in creating and maintaining amicable relations between the civilians and the military officers. A professional force envisaged in this theory will go along in ensuring peaceful co-existence helps fight vices such as corruption and military coups.