Human Cloning Should be Illegal :: Opposing Perspective Essays

Human Cloning Should be Illegal arse you imagine a world where everyone looked the same and had the same DNA? This could require true due to the advances in science in the field of copy. We ar coming into an age where scientists excite started clone non-human mammals as well as fish. Soon, they will want to start cloning humans. Since human cloning is so dangerous, unethical, and too expensive for reproductive purposes, it should be illegal.Human cloning is dangerous. It is estimated that amongst 95 and 98 percent of cloning experiments have failed (Genetics and Society). These downfalls to cloning argon in the form of miscarriages and stillbirths (Genetics and Society). Cloned human beings also run the risk of having voiceless genetic ab regulationities. Children cloned from adult DNA would, in a sense, already have old genes. These fryrens main problem would be engendering and emergence old too quickly. This includes arthritis, appearance, and organ function. Since the c hance of having a child with cordial and physical problems is so a good deal toweringer than that of a normally conceived child, cloning should be illegal.Human cloning is also unethical. Cloning, especially therapeutic cloning, requires the character of human embryos. Using these embryos would mean killing unborn children. Therapeutic cloning begins by removing the stem cells from an embryo (Human Cloning). The stem cells are used to drive bone, nerve, and muscle tissue. In the process of therapeutic cloning, an embryo, or a thwart in the early stages of development, is taken and parts of it are grown to develop parts of the body including organs and limbs (Human Cloning). Removing these stem cells would kill the embryo. The embryo, which would result in a child if left in the mothers womb, is spaced into parts, which are used for science.Finally, human cloning for reproductive purposes is too expensive. The damage to clone one human could be more than $100,000 (Herper). T hat is extremely high considering the cost of in vitro fertilization. In vitro fertilization costs between $3,500 and $25,000 depending on the procedure (Advanced Fertility Services). If someone could not become pregnant it is much more likely that they would chose to use fertilization and be guaranteed a healthy, normal child rather than spend the money to clone a child that could have defects. With fertilization costing only one fourth of cloning, wherefore would someone choose to clone?