Experiment to Study Conservation of Energy

Experiment to Study Conservation of verveConservation of EnergyOsamah NuwisserAbstractThe purpose of this experiment was to study the saving of vital force. We considered all fictitious character of energies present in our system (KE and PE) to compute native vigor at any instant during the experiment. We accomplish two tasks commencement ceremony we verified the conservation of add up naught during single step of the persistment of the sailplane all over the slope and then(prenominal) we compared summate slide fastener of several consecutive up and down motions to check whether the impact of glider with the bumper at the lower closing curtain of the ramp was ductile or inelastic. For first task, we prove that ki give the axeic cypher increases as capability energy decreases during downward motion of the glider however the total energy dust almost constant. For the second task, we found that the total energy of distributively step was less than that of the preceding one. This grades us that the collision between the glider and the bumper was inelastic due to which we have a net energy disadvantage. We also increased prime and mass of the glider and found that as a consequence the coefficient of eternal restitution decreases. Arbitrariness of PE is also described. openingAccording to the law of energy conservationEnergy idler uncomplete be created nor destroyed however it can be converted from one form of energy to the other.Also, we know that energy is conserved in elastic collision. Obviously, a loss in energy during a collision allow imply that the collision was inelastic. In this experiment, we accomplished two tasks in which were equal to(p) to verify/use the two mentioned facts.For the first task, we simply observed that during the first downward motion of the glider the total energy remained constant throughout the motion. Also, in our system there are only two types of energy involved kinetic energy and likely energy . soTherefore, for the total energy to remain constant it is necessary that the kinetic energy increases as the potential energy decreases due to downward motion of the glider. This can easily be observed if we temporary hookup the three curves, total energy, kinetic energy and potential energy, in one graph for downward motion of the glider.For the second task, we record the same data for a few consecutive upward and downward motions of the glider. By comparing the amount of total energy for each step, we can tell whether the collision between the glider and the bumper was elastic or inelastic. If the total energy of each step is less than that of its preceding step, the collision is inelastic.Coefficient of getting even- For our case, it is delimit asIts value can be in 0, 1. In case of 0 the glider will be at rest after collision, in case of 1 the collision will be elastic. For intermediate values, collision will be inelastic with glider in motion after the collision.Experim ental DescriptionThe apparatus consisted of a glider which was moved on a tilted ramp with a bumper at the lower end. This lap up was connected to the computer where the appropriate software product recorded the required quantities.The glider was kept at the top of ramp at rest. then it was allowed to move under gravity. It moved until it reached near the establish level where it hit the bumper and was reversed to move up the ramp where it stop at certain(a) prime and then moved down once again and so on. We stoped the data storage in the computer after well-nigh 10s. We repeated the experiment two succession varying big top and then mass. We took 3 readings in each case. formula i An Experimental regulate -upData and AnalysisRun 24 2014-10-30 170853Figure ii Position, Velocity Energy vs TimeData of position, velocity and energy (total, kinetic and potential) was plotted in the computer by the software against time ( mark off figure ii above). PE was qualifyd to be zero o n lay down level. For first task, we need to examine the variation of energy during first 2.5s. In start, PE is the maximum and KE is zero. As the glider moves down on the ramp, PE decreases and KE increases gradually. But we overtake that PE is not zero at its minimum. This non-zero minimum value is the value of the PE at the small height when it collides with the bumper.Figure iii A Comparison of KE, PE MEWe also find that the total energy is not conserved at the maneuver of collision where we see a loss in total energy (annihilation of energy).For second task, we compare the values of the total mechanical energy for each cycle with that of the preceding one. It is evident from the graph of energy that this energy fall suddenly after each collision. Thus the collision was inelastic. Also, we can see from the previous graphs that total energy of the glider was zero at certain instant after collision the glider collided with the bumper, imparted its all (kinetic) energy to the bumper and came to the rest. Then bumper shifted a fraction of this energy to the glider in form of KE forcing it to move in the opposite direction (up the ramp).To read total energy as zero at certain even, we can construct the following simplest case. dish out the glider to be at rest at a height from the ground on the ramp (say 80cm). Obviously, KE is zero. We define the origin at this point. So its height w.r.t. origin becomes zero. Now we measure PE with reference to the same point (because of arbitrariness of PE) which becomes . Thus the total energy at this point is zero. As far as the conservation of energy is concerned, that is satisfied because we have defined origin at the highest point. As the glider moves down the ramp, value of h becomes negative. This negative value of PE annihilates the convinced(p) value of KE that is produced due to increase velocity. Thus the total energy remains zero. Another way of doing the same is to define PE to be zero at the highest poin t, measure height as positive and add a minus sign with the formula for the PE in the equation of the total energy.To study the variation in the coefficient of restitution, we chose two continuous parameters height and mass of the glider. We took 3 readings because the tendency of increasing/decreasing should not be study by taking the minimum possible, 2, readings due of the possibility of error. The data is given in the following table.Table 1The following plot shows coefficient of restitution vs height.Figure iv Coefficient of riposte vs HeightSecond and terzetto readings show that the coefficient of restitution decreases with increasing the height. But the first two readings tell the reverse. However, by considering the error bars of first two points we can settle thatCoefficient of restitution decreases with increasing height.The following plot shows coefficient of restitution-mass vs mass.Figure v Coefficient of Restitution Mass vs MassThis tells us clearly thatCoefficient of restitution decreases with increasing mass.Results and remainderFor task 1 we have found that total energy remains constant during the motion of the glider until the collision occurs. Thus law of conservation is verified and its limitation (inelastic collision) is found.For task 2 By comparing the total energy in the lead collision with the total energy after collision, we finish that the collision is inelastic. Also, we showed that by using the arbitrariness of the value of PE we can set the total energy of a sliding object to be zero.By varying two continuous parameters mass of the glider and initial height of the glider, we found that increasing any one of them leads to a decrease in the value of coefficient of restitution. Since smaller value of coefficient of restitution means greater loss of energy, we conclude that by increasing height or by increasing mass, more energy is lost during the collision. The physical reasoning behind this finishing can be understood. In bo th the cases, increasing height or increasing mass, the maximum PE (mgh) increases. This entire maximum PE becomes maximum KE just before the collision. Thus more energy is lost during the collision.ReferencesAir Track and draw (1996). Available from Online http//demo.physics.uiuc.edu/LectDemo/scripts/demo_descript.idc?DemoID=110Energy Conservation on an Incline. Available from Online http//www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/energy/ie.cfmCoefficient of Restitution (2014). Available from Online http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_restitution